Housing May Have Hit Rock Bottom

May 3rd, 2007

Article below is from the San Diego Union Tribune 

Housing may have hit bottom

Prices to start rebound next fall, forecast says STAFF WRITER

May 1, 2007  

Despite a surge in home foreclosures, the worst may be over for San Diego County’s beleaguered housing market, according to a study to be released today by UCLA’s Anderson Forecast, one of the state’s leading economic think tanks. But that’s not to say that home prices are going to immediately start going back up.The Anderson forecasters, who took the lead in predicting a housing slowdown nearly four years ago, project that prices will decline by less than 2 percent through next summer, then start to rebound.But they add that there’s a major wild card: the question of whether a wave of foreclosures might drag down local home prices and exacerbate the current economic slowdown.“We’ve only seen the very tip of the iceberg” in foreclosures, warned Ryan Ratcliff, a UCLA economist who evaluated the county’s housing market.San Diego housing prices have had a roller-coaster ride in the past three years. From the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2006, the median home price shot up 23 percent – from $417,938 to $513,915 – partly fueled by low interest rates and high-risk mortgages. In the past year, the median price has fallen 5.6 percent, to $485,789, driven down by lower demand and tighter lending standards. Ratcliff projects that the median will slide to $478,000 by the second quarter of 2008 – basically a return to late 2004 levels – before prices start to rise again.

“The recent path of prices in San Diego opens itself up to several types of spin,” Ratcliff said. “If you want to grab headlines and scare homeowners, you can point to the 5 percent decline in the median sales price. . . . If you’d rather soothe those fears, you can simply say that 2007’s median sales prices are essentially the same as 2004’s.”

The decline in home prices has had a ripple effect through the economy. Local construction, real estate and finance firms shed thousands of jobs since last summer because of the housing slowdown. Consumers who once depended on home equity loans to make major purchases have tightened their wallets.

As a result, retail sales have edged up just 2 percent in the past year, after adjusting for inflation. This, in turn, has led to cutbacks in local retail jobs, particularly at department stores and home-improvement outlets.

“The hiring pace has slowed considerably,” said University of San Diego economist Alan Gin, who joined Ratcliff in compiling the Anderson Forecast’s report.

Year-over-year job growth averaged 22,400 in the first three months of 2006 but fell to 14,400 during the fourth quarter. By February and March, year-to-year employment growth slowed to fewer than 9,000 jobs.

Making matters worse, 40 percent of the jobs created during the past year have been in leisure and hospitality, the lowest-paying job category in San Diego, paying an average of $376 per week – less than half the average construction salary of $862.

In comparison, only 18 percent of new jobs created in 2005 were in leisure and hospitality, mostly restaurants, bars and hotels. Ratcliff said San Diego’s emphasis on leisure jobs contrasts with surrounding counties in Southern California, which have concentrated on adding higher-paying professional and technical services jobs. In San Diego, those jobs pay an average of $1,013 per week.

Ratcliff said that by the middle of this year, leisure and hospitality hiring will start to slow down as restaurant jobs that fed off the building boom begin to contract. Unemployment will rise from the current 4.3 percent to 5.1 percent before it starts to decline in the spring of 2008, he said.

“It could lead to a vicious cycle,” Gin said. “The slowing housing market leads to slower job growth and that further weakens the demand for housing.”Stan Sexton, who heads New Horizons Realty in La Mesa, said the sluggishness in hiring is already having an impact on sales.

“There’s a lot of unemployment and underemployment, especially among real estate agents,” Sexton said. “When the market was hot, a lot of the agents took on a lot of debt and used their newly found wealth to buy million-dollar homes. I would think a lot of them are sucking wind right now. And, in general, demand is so low that we’ve all felt it in the business.”

Sexton said that most of the people who buy homes on impulse have been shaken out of the market.

“I think we’re reverting to the primary reasons for why people traditionally move: a death in the family, divorce, job change,” he said. “The idea of ‘Honey, let’s go out and buy a new house’ seems to have disappeared.”

At the same time, foreclosures and defaults have risen dramatically. In the past year, notices of default more than doubled in San Diego County, jumping from 1,533 in the first quarter of 2006 to 3,931 in the first quarter of 2007.

“Default and foreclosure rates in Southern California are rapidly approaching levels only seen during the worst of the 1990s,” Ratcliff said.

He added that despite the gloomy statistics, the foreclosures have so far had no impact on local prices. In fact, San Diego’s median sales price has stabilized over the past three quarters, even as foreclosures rose.

Gary London, who heads San Diego’s London Group Realty Advisors, said that even though there has been a large increase in foreclosures, the total is still not a big number, given the size of the San Diego market.

“The bigger number is the people who are on the edge right now – getting help from their parents to pay off their mortgage, or forgoing vacations and cutting back on expenses to make ends meet,” he said.

London said that if home prices decline sharply or the housing slump lasts a long time, those people may not be able to get out from under their mortgages.

“Then, all bets are off,” he said.”

 

 

May 3rd, 2007

 

Excerpt from “Market Alerts”

January 25th, 2007

Commentary:  Sales of existing homes for December fell 0.8%.  In the convoluted
world of the bond market that is actually a bit of good news.  The bad news
component is this morning’s data from the National Association of Realtors is that
inventories fell 7.9% last month. The inventory decline prompted some market pundits
including David Lereah, chief economist for NAR, to announce, “It appears we have
established a bottom.”  Mr. Lereah is of course referring to the much published
decline in the residential housing market. 

There is a chance that Mr. Lereah’s pronouncement may prove to be a bit premature.
I suspect a number of homeowners chose to wait until after the holidays to put their
properties on the market – a decision that probably caused the inventory drop to be
moderately to strongly overstated.

We’re probably also looking at a showdown situation between homebuyers and home
sellers. Homebuyers are patiently waiting for homeowners to drop their asking price
further.  Relatively steady mortgage interest rates are not currently creating any
sense of urgency among prospective homebuyers to make the purchase simply because
financing costs are rising.  Homeowners on the other hand appear to be willing to
pull their homes off of the market rather than significantly reduce their asking
price.  I’m not sure which of the two will blink first – but ultimately conditions
will change and the pace of residential real-estate sales will accelerate once
again.

I think much of this morning’s sell pressure in the mortgage market is being created
by the fact that bond market investors are once again being required to soak-up
another installment of new government debt today.  This time around it is coming in
the form of $13 billion worth of 5-year notes.  The auction will conclude at 1:00
p.m. ET is this afternoon.  Once the auction is out of the way I think much of the
early selling pressure in the mortgage market will abate.

The prospects for any price improvement in the mortgage market yet this week now
hinges solely on tomorrow’s 10:00 a.m. ET release of the December New Home sales
number.  In my judgment it will take surprisingly soft sales figures together with
notably higher inventory levels to create the necessary momentum to push rate sheet
prices conspicuously higher.  While such an outcome is possible – it does not appear
to be very probable.  

Even though I realize I’m in jeopardy of sounding like a broken record, my advisory
remains unchanged.  I continue to strongly believe that unless/until the price of
the Fannie Mae 6.0% 30-year fixed-rate mortgage-backed security can manage to close
above a price of 100.686 we’re dealing with an market environment in which it will
be financially far wiser to be OUT of the market and run the risk of winding up
wishing that you were IN … as opposed to being IN the market and running the risk of
wishing to heck you were OUT.

Mortgage Insurance Now Deductible!!!

January 4th, 2007

Private Mortgage Insurance, a.k.a., PMI, is required whenever the loan-to-ratio amount exceeds 80% since these loans are considered riskier to the lender.  PMI benefits the lender by insuring against loss if the homeowner were to default on the loan.  Since PMI has historically been non-tax deductible, many buyers who finance more than 80% of their home purchase have chosen a primary and secondary loan rather than one loan that exceeds the 80% loan-to-value ratio.  In doing so, they receive the benefits of more tax-deductible interest and avoid having to pay PMI as neither loan exceeds the 80% loan-to-value ratio.  With interest rates rising on seconds, the ability to deduct PMI means that a single loan is now going to be a great option for many buyers and those who are looking to re-finance.  Limitations apply, and of course, when it comes to the IRS, getting tax advice from a professional is highly recommended.  Let us know if we can supply you with a referral to a tax professional so you can get information on how this new law benefits you.